Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 11:52:45 +0200 From: clutton <clutton@zoho.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: shells/bash-static fails to package/deinstall cleanly Message-ID: <1388051565.3771.59.camel@eva02.mbsd> In-Reply-To: <1388046987.3771.36.camel@eva02.mbsd> References: <52BBC768.6010702@dougbarton.us> <1388043634.3771.31.camel@eva02.mbsd> <52BBE04D.4060708@dougbarton.us> <1388046987.3771.36.camel@eva02.mbsd>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 10:36 +0200, clutton wrote: > On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 23:52 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > > Please don't remove people from the CC line. I copied the maintainer on > > purpose. > > > > On 12/25/2013 11:40 PM, clutton wrote: > > > On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 22:06 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > > >> The problem is that the bash.1 and bashbugs.1 man pages do not get > > >> compressed, and therefore the package fails. If I add a MAN1 variable to > > >> the Makefile with those pages listed, it works. > > >> > > >> Doug > > > > > > From https://wiki.freebsd.org/ports/StageDir > > > > > > MAN*/MANLANG/MLINKS now useless > > > manpage compression/uncompression is now automatically handled by the > > > framework if you use stagedir. > > > > ... and yet, that's not what happened here. Hence the problem report. > > > > > Take a look at my port: multimedia/ffmpegthumbnailer > > > I believe I did it right :) > > > > It's not my port, which is why I CCed the maintainer. > > > > Doug > > It is the case, the bash port uses STAGE, bash-static doesn't and bash > static is slave port of bash. Try to remove NO_STAGE from > bash-static/Makefile. Yeap, my guess was right. After removing NO_STAGE, I have man pages installed correctly. ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) ===> Installing for bash-static-4.2.45_1 ===> Checking if shells/bash-static already installed ===> Registering installation for bash-static-4.2.45_1 Installing bash-static-4.2.45_1... done Do you still think that backward compatibility is a good thing for such a project like FreeBSD ports? I'd like to spend time doing real porting instead of dealing with something like that bug. Many projects which were good from the beginning now are pieces of sheet because of backward compatibility, firefox jetpack sdk and xul show this clearly. I don't want to see FreeBSD ports in this list. Please fill the pr. diff --git a/shells/bash-static/Makefile b/shells/bash-static/Makefile index f5063a0..363a823 100644 --- a/shells/bash-static/Makefile +++ b/shells/bash-static/Makefile @@ -5,5 +5,4 @@ MASTERDIR= ${.CURDIR}/../../shells/bash OPTIONS_SLAVE= STATIC -NO_STAGE= yes .include "${MASTERDIR}/Makefile"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1388051565.3771.59.camel>