Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:27:24 +0200 From: "Valentin Bud" <valentin.bud@gmail.com> To: "Wojciech Puchar" <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Centralized DB of "system" users Message-ID: <139b44430812120527w7b22d8a1m860cbf308e4b67c3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20081212141156.E4001@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <139b44430812112348k5c51072ie771913c982f7cfe@mail.gmail.com> <49422A05.6050907@gmail.com> <ghtdp3$g0r$1@ger.gmane.org> <20081212120557.V3687@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <9bbcef730812120426t3c4b8a28q337c8379cd947702@mail.gmail.com> <20081212141156.E4001@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Wojciech Puchar < wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > this case (though it's very complicated to set up, especially the first >>>> >>> >>> why it is "right" solution? >>> >> >> Interoperability. Today, with Linux, tomorrow, Windows or Mac OS X. >> > > so not "right" but interoperable. if i do have only unix systems in LAN, > NIS is much better easier and faster. If you only have UNIX systems in LAN. But in my case i have Linux + FreeBSD (server). From the handbook NIS only works between FBSDs. Am i missing something? thank you, v > > > for windows-only LAN with unix server, simply using samba is OK. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?139b44430812120527w7b22d8a1m860cbf308e4b67c3>