Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 15:17:52 +0000 From: "Teske, Devin" <Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Devin Teske <dteske@freebsd.org>, "current@FreeBSD.org" <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default Message-ID: <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FC3AA2@ltcfiswmsgmb21> In-Reply-To: <20130713080732.GV85556@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20130712231637.GS85556@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FC2DBD@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <20130713080732.GV85556@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 13, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:52:19PM +0000, Teske, Devin wrote: On Jul 12, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, I have just committed (r253305) a change the make pkg_install not being bui= lt and installed by default on HEAD. If you are still relying on it, be careful and add WITH_PKGTOOLS=3Dyes in y= our src.conf(5) I think while a good move, we need to allow a window of development to re-w= ork other HEAD components. It might also be worth developing a lint-tool to make sure we get every las= t instance (both from C code and sh code) within our base before we motion = to cut a release with this change. I for one am effected and will have to change things. If you are referring to bsdconfig's package management, If you choose to read into it that way, sure. Yes. that's what I'm talking = about. NOTE: I can't be the only person in HEAD that's using pkg_install still. it is not working anyway HEAD as we do not and will not provides any pkg_install for HEAD via any of= the usual distribution process: http, ftp, CD. I'm quite aware that changes will be needed. I'm still interested in a "tra= nsition wiki" if one exists. Secondly if I'm properly reading src.conf.5 If there's a reference to "WITH_BSDCONFIG" in src.conf.5, that needs to be = removed. I wasn't aware that it was referenced in there. bsdconfig is not installed by default, Wrong, please see... http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D252862 which means we have a non default code depending on a now non default code, Wrong. I don't see a problem here, should I? Yes. -- Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FC3AA2>