Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Feb 2000 13:27:08 -0500 (EST)
From:      Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
To:        mjacob@feral.com
Cc:        freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: problems with Qlogic SCSI combo card
Message-ID:  <14517.30581.883054.17781@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10002240952130.52985-100000@beppo.feral.com>
References:  <14517.28475.49296.652665@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10002240952130.52985-100000@beppo.feral.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Matthew Jacob writes:
 > > 
 > > Matthew Jacob writes:
 > >  > 
 > >  > Is there any reason why we shouldn't allow only memory mapping
 > >  > if I/O mapping is broken?
 > >  > 
 > > 
 > > That's a great idea -- how do we tell?
 > 
 > Ah! do I detect a pink of irony? :-)

No.. I was serious, but in a hurry.   I was wondering how one tells if 
a ppb doesn't deal with i/o space access behind it.  Is there a
standard value you get back when you read the i/o base & i/o limit
registers in config space, or is there some other way to tell, or do
we need a quirk for 21050s, etc..

Drew


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14517.30581.883054.17781>