Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 09:00:09 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: time_t not to change size on x86, votes Message-ID: <15325.24809.802579.778980@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <p05101006b8027094cbe1@[128.113.24.47]> References: <200110270636.f9R6aik43419@apollo.backplane.com> <20011027064343.03830380A@overcee.netplex.com.au> <20011027124149.A486@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <p05101003b800cfd71d2c@[128.113.24.47]> <20011028171553.E32015@dragon.nuxi.com> <p05101006b8027094cbe1@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garance A Drosihn writes: > > I think those who run Alpha should vote on Alpha. I do not run > Alpha, and do not expect that I personally will get an Alpha > machine. As an alpha user, I feel that the alpha should NOT be migrated to a 64-bit time_t until & unless the i386 is migrated. I think we all can agree that due to a corporate knife in the back, the alpha will have a much shorter lifespan than the x86. I seriously doubt there will be any alphas running FreeBSD 36 years from now. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15325.24809.802579.778980>