Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:50:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@unixdaemons.com> Cc: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: m_getcl and end-to-end performance Message-ID: <15714.40341.115512.786712@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <20020820154416.A27782@unixdaemons.com> References: <15714.27671.533860.408996@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20020820093939.B48541@iguana.icir.org> <15714.39494.661931.882244@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20020820154416.A27782@unixdaemons.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bosko Milekic writes: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 03:36:38PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > Luigi Rizzo writes: > > > > > > now if you have patches i'll be happy to have a look at them. > > > > Here's what I'm running with now. It removes the M_PKTHDR > > requirement, allowing me to use multiple m_getcl()'s to stock jumbo > > frames. > > I forgot about something in Luigi's original patch: > > Does this stuff make sure to only stock the pool with mbufs+clusters > and not mbufs+any_other_external_buffer? This requirement seems to be Yes, it checks that M_EXT_WRITABLE(m) is true before adding it to the pool. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15714.40341.115512.786712>