Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 10:55:03 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: nsayer@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysctl interface for apm? Message-ID: <1884.963737703@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 15 Jul 2000 23:25:04 PDT." <200007160625.XAA92886@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200007160625.XAA92886@freefall.freebsd.org>, nsayer@FreeBSD.ORG wri tes: >So what does everyone think? Is it suitable to add a read only >sysctl 'machdep.apm_powerstate' that reports either AC, nn%, >or N/A ? Or should the format be numeric (999 = AC, <=100 = battery %, >-1 = N/A)? Or should we not bother? :-) yes it is suitable. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1884.963737703>