Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:21:43 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: michael butler <imb@scgt.oz.au> Cc: nate@sri.MT.net (Nate Williams), stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arp and async problems Message-ID: <199602151821.LAA00383@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199602151814.FAA09626@asstdc.scgt.oz.au> References: <199602151811.LAA00327@rocky.sri.MT.net> <199602151814.FAA09626@asstdc.scgt.oz.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > There is no way I can afford to split out 14 subnets with only one address > > > in each to support a DNS and WWW server nor is it practical to stick that > > > many ethernet cards into the box. > > > Why split it out? Why not stick all of the alias' on the same network, > > so that the IP address are relevant on your primary network? > > So you're telling me that I can now use .. > > ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.225 netmask 255.255.255.240 > ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.226 alias netmask 255.255.255.240 > ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.227 alias netmask 255.255.255.240 > : > : > > .. this didn't work before (I tried it), does it now ? I don't believe so. What does 'ifconfig -a' return, and what alias's are you trying to use? nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602151821.LAA00383>