Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Feb 1996 14:15:29 -0800
From:      David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
To:        Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
Cc:        "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Broadcast, Netmask, and other such information 
Message-ID:  <199602152215.OAA07636@Root.COM>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 15 Feb 1996 14:15:17 MST." <199602152115.OAA01407@rocky.sri.MT.net> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Maybe I'm not making myself clear.  When I say 'addresses in the
>subnet', I'm trying to convey a number which *should* be a power of 2 #.
>In the above example, there are 32 addresses assigned in each subnet, of
>which there are only 31 usable as host addresses (except in the first
>and last subnets due to the .0 & .255 addresses being unusable).

   Actually, no, you would only get 30 hosts per subnet. The all-ones host
part on each subnet is the subnet's broadcast address and all-zeros host
can't be used, either.

-DG

David Greenman
Core Team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602152215.OAA07636>