Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Apr 1996 20:00:16 +1000
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        bde@zeta.org.au, jkh@time.cdrom.com
Cc:        freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: A request about comments in programs
Message-ID:  <199604211000.UAA18538@godzilla.zeta.org.au>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Redirected to -chat from -core]

>> I think this meaning is netspeak.  All my (old) dictionaries say that
>> it means "arguable, debatable, open to debate, etc".

>That's actually pretty interesting - I've never heard it used in that
>way.  This should probably be redirected to -chat, but I'd still be
>curious if any of the other core members here have heard "moot" used
>in the manner you've seen it defined!

I checked some more (small, old) dictionaries.  The above meaning survives
translations:

Putnam's Contemporary French Dictionary (copyright 1969 by Collins, 1972 by
Putnam, Berkeley Medallion edition 1976):
moot a discutable
discutable a debatable, disputable

Collins German-English English-German Dictionary (copyright 1953 by Collins,
reprinted 1963):
Moot-point n. strittiger Punkt
Strittig a. in dispute

Collins seems to agree with itself :-).

Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604211000.UAA18538>