Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Oct 1996 13:54:31 -0700
From:      "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@MindBender.serv.net>
To:        "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net>
Cc:        Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>, Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Iozone: local vs nfs drives 
Message-ID:  <199610172054.NAA12845@MindBender.serv.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 17 Oct 96 15:18:37 -0400. <Pine.NEB.3.95.961017151743.452B-100000@spirit.ki.net> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>On Fri, 18 Oct 1996, Michael Hancock wrote:

>> On Thu, 17 Oct 1996, Jaye Mathisen wrote:

>> > I would be interested in the answer to this, I see the same behaviour on
>> > a 2940/Quantum Atlas combo, although the numbers are quite a bit higher.
>> > In any case, given specifically the issue of news, where most activity is
>> > reading, this is disturbing.

>> IOZONE isn't the benchmark to use to determine news performance.

>	Actually, both my IOZONE tests were done on "non-news" drives...
>they were done on /usr, on relatively dead systems..

Did you have tagged-command queuing enabled?  According to my tests,
that will make a BIG difference, if you have decent drives.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Michael L. VanLoon                           michaelv@MindBender.serv.net
        --<  Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x  >--
    NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3,
        Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32...
    NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610172054.NAA12845>