Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Jan 1997 10:34:30 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Cc:        grog@lemis.de, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, isdn@muc.ditec.de
Subject:   Re: bisdn
Message-ID:  <199701271734.KAA05765@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <9971.854322113@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jan 26, 97 03:41:53 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > >>  and greatly appreciated, too ! Several people will be working on getting
> > >>  this integrated into -current (aka 3.0).
> > >
> > > Really?  Awesome!  I'd just about given up! :-)
> > 
> > What's the problem?  I've been running bisdn on 2.2-CURRENT and
> > 3.0-CURRENT since last May.
>
> I don't think that the problems are technical so much as political,
> something which generally sucks given that the last thing the free
> software community needs to be doing is shooting its feet off and
> generally handing the boys at microsoft an even more overwhelming
> advantage ("you can't crush us!  hah! we plan to commit suicide
> through sheer stupidity and ego way before we'll let that happen!" :-)
> 
> Oh well.  Sigh! :-)

Clearly your process for adding committers and/or having committers do
your code reviews has failed to keep up with the BISDN folk's ability
to generate code.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701271734.KAA05765>