Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Feb 1997 22:14:34 +1100
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        bde@zeta.org.au, mpp@freefall.freebsd.org
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: sig*set macros in <signal.h>
Message-ID:  <199702271114.WAA28126@godzilla.zeta.org.au>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> >Is there a good reason for having the sig*set macros defined
>> >in <signal.h> and the equivalent functions in libc?

>> [Long answer.]

>Let's try this again.

>Can we remove the macro definitions, and just rely on the functions?

Not so long answer: why do you want to?  Some versions of Linux
removed them because they are buggy, but the FreeBSD libc versions
are equally buggy.

Short answer: no.

Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702271114.WAA28126>