Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 02 Mar 1997 14:23:35 -0800
From:      Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
To:        Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Cc:        scrappy@hub.org, ejs@bfd.com, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) 
Message-ID:  <199703022223.OAA07162@rah.star-gate.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 02 Mar 1997 17:15:33 EST." <199703022215.RAA00851@crh.cl.msu.edu> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, okay you convince the folks which are generating the binaries
for the latest clients to give us a binary for our PPRO 8)


	Cheers,
	Amancio

>From The Desk Of Charles Henrich :
> > >From The Desk Of The Hermit Hacker :
> > > On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Eric J. Schwertfeger wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Now if we can convince bror@sms.fi to overclock his dual pentium and 
get
> 
> > him
> > > > > the new client we may be able to beat the dual 400mhz alpha 8)
> > > >
> > > > If you check the stats page, you'll notice he just changed his listing
> > > > from 606k keys/sec to 676k keys/sec, so he has the updated binary.  The
> > > > wonders of mime attachments :-)
> > > >
> > >
> > >     Where can one get this updated binary?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ftp://rah.star-gate.com/pub/rc5-56-client.gz
> >
> > Have at it 8)
> 
> Its interesting to see a factually "ancient" binary being called the updated
> one :)
> 
> -Crh
> 
>        Charles Henrich     Michigan State University     henrich@msu.edu
> 
>                          http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703022223.OAA07162>