Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 May 1997 19:46:59 -0400
From:      "Donald J. Maddox" <root@cola68.scsn.net>
To:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 2.1.7 and COMPAT_43 -Reply
Message-ID:  <19970513194659.14359@cola68.scsn.net>
In-Reply-To: <s3789944.055@pii.com>; from Robert Clark on Tue, May 13, 1997 at 04:33:49PM -0700
References:  <s3789944.055@pii.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 13, 1997 at 04:33:49PM -0700, Robert Clark wrote:
> Gas is optional in a car, but it won't run without it.

    That's a clever answer, but I think it still doesn't address my
point...

    Don't you think it would be better if _required_ parts of the kernel
were included by default, thereby saving enormous bandwith wastage on
threads of this nature?  Why give newbies the opportunity to shoot
themselves in the foot needlessly?

    If "required options" were simply not listed as config options,
what would be the down side?

-- 


                                            Donald J. Maddox
                                            (dmaddox@scsn.net)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970513194659.14359>