Date: Wed, 04 Jun 1997 17:45:31 +1000 From: Stephen McKay <syssgm@dtir.qld.gov.au> To: Pat Bozeman <peb@george.lbl.gov> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virtual address question for VM guru's Message-ID: <199706040745.RAA16094@ogre.dtir.qld.gov.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.95.970603211241.23254C-100000@george.lbl.gov> from Pat Bozeman at "Wed, 04 Jun 1997 04:36:38 %2B0000" References: <Pine.SOL.3.95.970603211241.23254C-100000@george.lbl.gov>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, 4th June 1997, Pat Bozeman wrote: >What I would like to do is map specific process address ranges into the >kernel's virtual address space and then keep track of the new kernel >virtual address which should point to the correct physical address >regardless of which process is active. Have a look at /sys/kern/sys_pipe.c for some hints. I think you should be able to do what you want using the same techniques. Buyer beware, of course! I've never done this myself. Stephen.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706040745.RAA16094>