Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 06:04:10 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: toor@dyson.iquest.net (John S. Dyson) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, eivind@yes.no, jlemon@americantv.com, fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: syncer / SMP question Message-ID: <199802280604.XAA20809@usr05.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199802280513.AAA00289@dyson.iquest.net> from "John S. Dyson" at Feb 28, 98 00:13:06 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Interlocks are for very short-term locks and for locking the aquisition > > of full locks. > > > One rule-of-thumb is never to block (tsleep) when you have an interlock. This would make a good assert for a kernel compiled with debugging turned on... 8-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802280604.XAA20809>