Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 May 1998 21:20:02 -0500
From:      Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com>
To:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: top -osize
Message-ID:  <19980528212002.A11468@emsphone.com>
In-Reply-To: <19980528211849.A10559@rtfm.net>; from "Nathan Dorfman" on Thu May 28 21:18:49 GMT 1998
References:  <19980528211849.A10559@rtfm.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (May 28), Nathan Dorfman said:
> It's been confirmed, it's not just me:
> 
> <Andrew/#nohelp> nathan: -osize doesn't work here.
> 
> Anyway, top -osize is supposed to sort by size instead of cpu usage.
> Instead it prints a "this platform doesn't support arbitrary
> ordering, sorry" message and ignores the option.
> 
> Is there a real reason for it not being able to do this or is
> something just mildly broken?

The only reason is that no one's wanted to write the sort routines. 
Out of the 40 platforms supported by top 3.5b7, only 5 (aix32, aix41,
sunos4, sunos5, and untrix4) even implemented -o.

If I need a process list sorted by something, I usually pipe ps through
sort myself.

And you're in the wrong channel :)

	-Dan Nelson
	dnelson@emsphone.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980528212002.A11468>