Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 May 1998 07:00:00 +0200
From:      Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: I see one major problem with DEVFS...
Message-ID:  <19980530070000.29794@follo.net>
In-Reply-To: <17587.896504155@time.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Fri, May 29, 1998 at 09:55:55PM -0700
References:  <19980530060008.33353@follo.net> <17587.896504155@time.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 29, 1998 at 09:55:55PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > Allowing mknod on a devfs would be somewhat akin to pointing an Uzi at
> > your foot and playing with how close to the actual trig limit you can
> > pull the trigger without firing.
> 
> Naw, nothing so dire.  Backwards compatability doesn't always have to
> be asthetically pleasing, it just has to work and for a reasonable
> period of time until people have made the transition.

If we're talking a true mknod, I still stand by the comment.  If we're
talking a compatibility hack that look like mknod, that's another cup
of tea, and one which I just sent three ways of 'solving'.

Eivind.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980530070000.29794>