Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 11:00:50 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: nik@iii.co.uk Cc: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>, Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, Joseph Koshy <jkoshy@FreeBSD.ORG>, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.0 Schedule, ELF and CAM Message-ID: <199808120130.LAA22961@cain.gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Aug 1998 09:38:46 %2B0100." <19980811093846.A11516@iii.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mon, Aug 10, 1998 at 11:02:48PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > If not "/usr/lib", where would you like your elf libs to go to? > /usr/lib.elf and /usr/lib.aout, with /usr/lib being a symlink to whichever > one is the current default on the system. > This is probably a frighteningly bad idea, but every time I've mentioned > it on -hackers or -current, no one's stood up to say so. That's a bit limiting.. Since you can use both types of libs, why limit youself? I would think that in most cases ldconfig /usr/lib/<format of choice> would be a better solution. --------------------------------------------------------------------- |Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software | |http://www.gsoft.com.au | |The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to| |choose from. -- Andrew Tanenbaum | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808120130.LAA22961>