Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Aug 1998 20:06:58 -0400
From:      "GR Gaudreau" <grgaud@sprint.ca>
To:        <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD or Linux?
Message-ID:  <199808130009.UAA02658@hme0.mailrouter01.sprint.ca>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Tue, 11 Aug 1998 at 19:52 SAT, Brett Taylor wrote:
> Your average Redhat RPM package installs not only the binaries, docs,
etc.,
> but also all the necessary startup files in Redhat's SysV-like /etc/rc.d
> tree.  IOW, should the newbie admin choose to install "everything" during
> system installation, he will also be _running_ everything.
> 
> Anyway, I'm wandering off topic here...

Actually, I'm glad you are. What would the difference be with FreeBSD? It
would NOT do what RH 5.1 does?

--
G.R. Gaudreau
grgaud@sprint.ca
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/5783/

If a man who is mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being
mistaken, or cease to be honest.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808130009.UAA02658>