Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 2 Oct 1998 22:12:04 -0500
From:      Frank Pawlak <fpawlak@execpc.com>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Device Drivers for Linux and Intel's annoucement
Message-ID:  <19981002221204.C11661@execpc.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.1.19981002202119.040f7c30@mail.lariat.org>; from Brett Glass on Fri, Oct 02, 1998 at 08:29:21PM -0600
References:  <23307.907176696@time.cdrom.com> <4.1.19981002190913.040f3b60@mail.lariat.org> <36158AD6.811BD16E@u.washington.edu> <4.1.19981002202119.040f7c30@mail.lariat.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 02, 1998 at 08:29:21PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 07:24 PM 10/2/98 -0700, dmorrisn wrote:
> >> History has proven exactly the opposite. The introduction of Windows
> >> application support in OS/2 actually accelerated its demise. If FreeBSD
> >> starts billing itself as "a better Linux than Linux" it will fall into
> >> precisely the same trap and will never catch up.
> >
> >That is a rhetorical fallacy.  (Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc -- "After
> >this therefore because of this")
> 
> No fallacy at all. It's been proven again and again that emulating another 
> OS that's more popular provides the ultimate disincentive to developers. 
> OS/2 is only one recent case in point.
> 
> Look at it from the developer's point of view. Why EVER develop a native
> FreeBSD version of any product if one can just do a Linux version?
> 
> So, FreeBSD's name never appears on the box. Tech support for commercial
> products is unavailable when they run under FreeBSD, while they're well
> supported under Linux. Linux gets the mindshare and FreeBSD becomes known
> as an unsupported also-ran.
> 
> I watched this happen with OS/2. I couldn't even get support for WINDOWS
> apps running under OS/2, much less get native versions that were any
> good.
> 
> >The reason OS/2 died was because IBM and Microsoft couldn't get along.
> >That's why Microsoft cut them off.
> 
> The Linux camp doesn't exactly get along with FreeBSD either. They trash
> it constantly.
> 
> --Brett

Brett, you are exactly on target.  But I am afraid that you are just
pissing against the wind.

I like you, am convinced that there is an economic issue that is holding
FreeBSD back in the market place.
-- 
    --Frank

"At no time is the freedom of speech more precious then when a man hits
his thumb with a hammer."
   --Marshall Lumsden

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981002221204.C11661>