Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1998 09:56:25 +0000 From: dmaddox@scsn.net (Donald J. Maddox) To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Shouldn't 'make includes' install stand.h? Message-ID: <19981004095625.A879@scsn.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
While trying to build the new boot loader, it kept failing because stand.h was not found. To make a long story short, I had previously done a 'make -DCLOBBER includes' in the (apparently mistaken) belief that this was the canonically-accepted way of making sure that I had a clean, up-to-date, and _complete_ set of includes in /usr/include. It appears that /usr/include/stand.h only gets installed when libstand is installed. Shouldn't a 'make -DCLOBBER includes' result in a _complete_ set of includes? Are there other includes than stand.h that don't get installed by 'make includes'? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981004095625.A879>