Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 19:40:49 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, mike@smith.net.au, parag@cgt.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lisp vs. Forth (was Re: New boot loader and alternate kernels ) Message-ID: <199811041940.MAA12697@usr07.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199811032319.PAA00900@dingo.cdrom.com> from "Mike Smith" at Nov 3, 98 03:19:27 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> What's the feeling on the lisp vs. Forth argument? If the FORTH Interpreter were OpenBoot syntax compliant, we could use it to interpret ROM code on a number of cards designed to be usable in both Intel and PPC systems. Also, there's the whole OpenFirmware standard thing... Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811041940.MAA12697>