Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 19:07:45 +1030 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: Chris Knight <fbsd-stb@ghostwheel.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Vinum in 2.2-stable, but broken? Message-ID: <19990202190745.C76680@freebie.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990202000157.0096b940@pop2.ghostwheel.com>; from Chris Knight on Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 12:14:54AM -0800 References: <4.1.19990202000157.0096b940@pop2.ghostwheel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, 2 February 1999 at 0:14:54 -0800, Chris Knight wrote: > I noticed that vinum was introduced into 2.2.8 within the past week or so, > but it isn't compiled in a 'make world', and it doesn't compile directly. > Is is safe to assume that this made in into 2.2-stable by accident? Well, not completely. It was introduced deliberately, but an accident happened during the commit, and the modules ended up in the wrong directory. I was going to leave them there, but something has gone funny with the Makefile (it had a dependency for vnode_if.[ch], but doesn't build them). Since it currently doesn't hurt, and I don't have time to look at what's really going on, I have just left it as it is. If somebody else wants to look at why it doesn't build (please?), I'd be grateful. Greg -- See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990202190745.C76680>