Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 14:46:56 +1300 From: "Dan Langille" <junkmale@xtra.co.nz> To: joseph@randomnetworks.com Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, de-bsd-chat@DE.FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms SuSE 6.0 SMP by factor 2.3 !!! Message-ID: <19990315014709.EAPS682101.mta1-rme@wocker> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9903141938270.10542-100000@sonic.digital-web.net> References: <19990315001521.A39079@titan.klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 Mar 99, at 19:41, Joseph Scott wrote: > On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > > See the links in my signature ... > > > > Enjoy it ... Linux brings 0% performance gain in the "stable" system > > SMP arena ...... > > I took a quick look and it's eat to have some numbers with these > features. I'm not likely to get my hands on multiproc. machines so I was > hoping that someone would do something like this. > > Would it be possible for you to run the same tests with the 2.2 > kernel? I would think that regardless of the label ( "stable", "current", > etc ) the 2.2 kernel would be the one most people would put up against > FBSD 3.1 FWIW the first thing someone mentioned to me was the tests were against Linux 2.0 kernel... Those were people who don't use FreeBSD. -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary http://www.FreeBSDDiary.com/freebsd To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990315014709.EAPS682101.mta1-rme>