Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:54:40 -0700
From:      Chris Piazza <cpiazza@home.net>
To:        Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk>
Cc:        "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>, Nicolas Blais <nicblais@videotron.ca>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: HELP!!! -CURRENT libtool problem.
Message-ID:  <19990712155440.B494@norn.ca.eu.org>
In-Reply-To: <19990711220050.A31542@catkin.nothing-going-on.org>; from Nik Clayton on Sun, Jul 11, 1999 at 10:00:50PM %2B0100
References:  <37810FDD.C1321FE7@videotron.ca> <37887C61.2F462FD@newsguy.com> <19990711220050.A31542@catkin.nothing-going-on.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 11, 1999 at 10:00:50PM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
> <advocate type="devils">

hmm...

<snip>

> > 
> > Any other question?
> 
> Q:  I want to use this cool piece of software that's in the FreeBSD 
>     ports system.  But I can't build it on my 3.x-stable system.
> 
>     Why not?
> 
> A:  Ah, sorry.  The ports system only targets -current, trying to get
>     it to work with -stable is too much work.  If you want to be sure
>     of using the ports system successfully you need to be running
>     -current.
> </advocate>
> 
> Or was this policy reversed recently and I didn't notice (always a 
> likely possibility).

Um..er... I hope you were really just being sarcastic.  All ports
should work on -stable as well as -current.  In fact, more build
on -stable than -current according to http://bento.freebsd.org/.
If any ports work on one but not the other it is a bug and should
be fixed.  So I ask, what policy?

> 
> [ And yes, I *know* the ports system relies on volunteers, and that if
>   people can't be bothered to test their ports on a -stable system then
>   there's not a lot we can do about it.  But this does lead to the 
>   amusing situation (for various values of "amusing") where on one hand
>   we're telling people not to use -current unless they really know what
>   they're doing, but on the other hand we're (in some cases) preventing
>   them from using a major piece of FreeBSD infrastructure which is 
>   expressly designed to make life easier for exactly the sort of people
>   who should be running -stable. ]

-Chris

-- 
cpiazza@home.net              cpiazza@FreeBSD.org
"A great many people think they are thinking when
they are merely rearranging their prejudices"
                                   -William James


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990712155440.B494>