Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Jul 1999 07:27:05 +0200 (MET DST)
From:      Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
To:        wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman)
Cc:        nagao@iij.ad.jp, des@flood.ping.uio.no, net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: dummynet -> rate limiting
Message-ID:  <199907180527.HAA17810@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
In-Reply-To: <199907172241.SAA24085@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett Wollman" at Jul 17, 99 06:40:49 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Ok, i have no objections in principle, but i fail to see the use of
> > pps limiting. What does it model in a context (IP) where packets for sure
> > are not constant size ?
> 
> Surely I shouldn't need to give this lesson to you, in particular,
> Luigi.  As we all know, performance of network elements can be broken
> down into two components: per-packet cost, and per-bit (mostly
...
> Cisco added a packet-rate-limiting feature in their ISP train some
> time ago, and it made it into 12.0 on certain platforms, so at least
> one big Cisco customer must think it's useful.


But maybe IOS does not have bit-rate-limiting ? With dummynet you
can achieve almost the same effect by setting a pipe with a very
low bit rate, and yes, this will penalize big packets but if the
purpose is protecting yourself, being conservative is not a such
concern. Plus, for good protection you'd want both pps and bit-rate
limiting, so this raises the issue whether these two features on a pipe
should be mutually exclusive or not (in practice the first is ok since
you can cascade pipes...).

What i was wondering is whether this pps fits some economic or network
model where a packet is major cost (or billing) component.

other than that, i really don't mind having 'pps' limitations, or other
things, in dummynet -- i am just trying to see if they solve problems
that cannot be handled with already existing features.

	cheers
	luigi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907180527.HAA17810>