Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 20:43:38 +0300 From: Alexey Zelkin <phantom@cris.net> To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> Cc: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org>, doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tutorials Message-ID: <19991117204338.B17330@scorpion.crimea.ua> In-Reply-To: <19991116204509.A99933@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: <19991115173853.A6833@scorpion.crimea.ua> <19991115201733.B19819@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <19991116080341.A92155@kilt.nothing-going-on.org> <19991116204509.A99933@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, On Tue, Nov 16, 1999 at 08:45:09PM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > >I'm inclined to agree with Alexey. Removing these from the CVS tree won't > >inconvenience you Jeroen, will it? You know that you can always pull them > >back in your local copy of the CVS tree? > > Be my guest. > > I keep a local copy of the real CVS tree here (doc, ports, src, gnats) > complete with all the Attics and ,v files I need. =) > > So be my guest. It wouldn't hinder me. I think I am going to import > the 2.x DDWG into my document as 2.x reference. Anyone know how to do a > repo-cpoy? =) Why do you need repo-copy ? You wanna save history of development ? As I can understand DDWG will be completely rewriten, therefore we can remove current tutorials/ddwg and import new ddwg (for FreeBSD 3.x/4.x) then (and to new place). As for me current history associated with ddwg.sgml is absolutely useless for new version of the Guide. I am going to remove doc/en_US.ISO_8859-1/tutorials. Any objections ? -- /* Alexey Zelkin && phantom@cris.net */ /* Tavric National University && phantom@crimea.edu */ /* http://www.ccssu.crimea.ua/~phantom && phantom@FreeBSD.org */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991117204338.B17330>