Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 00:43:03 -0700 From: LuKreme <kremels@kreme.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Palemoon branding violation Message-ID: <1B1944BD-C232-4841-9C6D-D0011B9C7069@kreme.com> In-Reply-To: <652bf20e-3d99-b522-a413-a9ab53a8b0c2@sorbs.net> References: <20180206222137.GA78935@skeletor.feld.me> <A905406A-5097-489C-8C95-764870F11F3B@kreme.com> <20180207092827.GA81527@home.opsec.eu> <CANYZJQY=7Lk60khQRjR8H8jLcCaasut8R6f%2B9fgyhDvxD6=RdQ@mail.gmail.com> <fe353ecd-90ce-9f05-900a-2cdd054f5236@sorbs.net> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1802081035280.50080@aneurin.horsfall.org> <652bf20e-3d99-b522-a413-a9ab53a8b0c2@sorbs.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 7, 2018, at 20:06, Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> wrote: > Just saying telling people not to call the product the same as the tradema= rk if there are any changes to the product is the way to protect the tradema= rk. But is there a trademark? It seems not from an earlier post. --=20 This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1B1944BD-C232-4841-9C6D-D0011B9C7069>