Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:16:04 +0200 From: Stefan Parvu <sparvu@kronometrix.org> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RBPI3B+ FreeBSD 12 ZFS Message-ID: <1ED1A0A0-C569-433C-9341-30C40BC4CBF7@kronometrix.org> In-Reply-To: <19ed5715-f1f1-6c5d-5dc6-e9c5225e5445@denninger.net> References: <E387BB48-540D-4F5C-BD4D-2BF410108219@kronometrix.org> <a0239ad1-5b98-1149-1d14-966ed8670e79@denninger.net> <5D976A97-9800-4A9F-A155-F3BD998AFB4C@kronometrix.org> <19ed5715-f1f1-6c5d-5dc6-e9c5225e5445@denninger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'm trying to figure out the use case. First of all Im trying to understand, if this would even work on a 64bit=20= RBPI board and STABLE 12.0. Just curiosity. I do recall old days when I = was working in Sun ZFS systems would require some RAM to work correctly. Then we found more robust and resilient ZFS for different workloads than = UFS regarding data corruption, power outages etc. So I was thinking I could = experiment with our application RBPI UFS and replace that with ZFS.=20 thanks for pointers. appreciated. Stefan=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1ED1A0A0-C569-433C-9341-30C40BC4CBF7>