Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 15:57:44 -0800 (PST) From: Mike Harding <mvh@ix.netcom.com> To: eroubinc@u.washington.edu Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: When does the 4.x branch go stable? Message-ID: <20000109235744.01C49A54EE@netcom1.netcom.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.10.10001091547130.91952-100000@dante24.u.washington.edu> (message from Evgeny Roubinchtein on Sun, 9 Jan 2000 15:48:48 -0800 (PST)) References: <Pine.A41.4.10.10001091547130.91952-100000@dante24.u.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
mmm - I guess I am ready to go to 4.x in general, just wondering when it would be 'safe'. This is for my home system and I would prefer to do a source code update in place... I suppose this will be OK once the branch is tagged and a few people _haven't_ complained that the upgrade melted down their systems. I guess 4.0 will be a major change but I don't have anywhere to back up... - Mike H. Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 15:48:48 -0800 (PST) From: Evgeny Roubinchtein <eroubinc@u.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-RULES: lists On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Mike Harding wrote: > >I'm interested in picking up the new gcc, but I was just curious as to >when the 4.x branch becomes -STABLE, since the release is just around >the corner. Also, that would be 4.x -STABLE, right? This is perhaps tangential, but if you wish to use gcc-2.95.2 for your projects, why not install the "egcs" port (it's actually gcc-2.95.2)? -- Evgeny The computing field is always in need of new cliches. - Alan Perlis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000109235744.01C49A54EE>