Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 23:17:22 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@pavilion.net> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.org>, "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/ls extern.h ls.1 ls.c ls.h print.c Message-ID: <20000604231722.H620@pavilion.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006032357500.45538-100000@sasami.jurai.net>; from winter@jurai.net on Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 11:59:24PM -0400 References: <21730.960070106@localhost> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006032357500.45538-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 11:59:24PM -0400, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > On Sat, 3 Jun 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > That's 100K difference and certainly a significant increase, though > > one could also perhaps argue that at 189K, ls(1) is no longer the > > thin, svelte utility we remember from her youth and another chocolate > > eclair or two isn't going to make that big a difference at this point. > > I think having a /bin/ls and a /usr/bin/ls would be the way to go then. > > /bin/ls can be the "thin, svelte utility" > /usr/bin/ls can have all the eclairs it wants. If we're going to do that we may as well keep colour support as a separate port. There's no point having two ls's in the tree IMHO. Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000604231722.H620>