Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 10:53:32 -0500 From: "Jacques A . Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports-maintainers? Message-ID: <20000623105332.J76049@bone.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <20000623080331.D77304@argon.gryphonsoft.com>; from andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM on Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 08:03:31AM -0400 References: <394CA25D.77A15740@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0006231327100.23642-100000@nunki.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20000623075752.B77304@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000623080331.D77304@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 08:03:31AM -0400, Will Andrews wrote: > I just had an idea.. what if this list could also include commit > messages relating only to ports? > > Kinda like cvs-all but only for ports? No thanks ... a low-volume list should certainly not get commit messages. Not to mention the penalty of receiving every port commit message twice, if you want to watch cvs-all too. That isn't to say that there might be some merit to a port commits only list-- just don't tie it to some other list as well. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000623105332.J76049>