Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 15:41:11 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.demon.nl> To: Mark Ovens <marko@freebsd.org> Cc: Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com>, Simon J Mudd <sjmudd@pobox.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make buildworld failing Message-ID: <20001008154111.D96958@freebie.demon.nl> In-Reply-To: <20001008132312.A253@parish>; from marko@freebsd.org on Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 01:23:12PM %2B0100 References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010081103370.9771-100000@phoenix.ea4els.ampr.org> <39E03D71.AC278983@urx.com> <20001008132312.A253@parish>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: > On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 02:25:05AM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > > > Simon J Mudd wrote: > > > > > > I successfully cvsup'ed the source to stable on 17/09/00 and decided > > > to upgrade to the latest version of -STABLE with cvsup. > > > > > > The cvsup command works fine, but make buildworld fails at the same place > > > with the same error message: > > > > I would remove /usr/obj/* before I try again. You will have to > > cd /usr/obj > > chflags -R noschg * > > rm -rf * > > > > cd /usr/obj > rm -rf * > chflags -R noschg * > rm -rf * > > should be quicker as chflags(1) won't have to test every file (99% of which > won't have the schg flag set). To be honest I'm puzzled as to the usefulness of noschg in the first place. People already having root privs are not stopped by it. Or is it only aimed at the higher securelevels? -- Wilko Bulte wilko@freebsd.org Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001008154111.D96958>