Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 11:47:19 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf Message-ID: <200010081747.LAA02635@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 08 Oct 2000 19:23:11 %2B0200." <20001008192311.B73177@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <20001008192311.B73177@lucifer.bart.nl> <200010081245.FAA23881@freefall.freebsd.org> <200010081713.LAA02405@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20001008192311.B73177@lucifer.bart.nl> Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven writes: : -On [20001008 19:15], Warner Losh (imp@village.org) wrote: : >In message <200010081245.FAA23881@freefall.freebsd.org> Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven writes: : >: Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_2_2) : >: etc inetd.conf : >: Log: : >: MFC: Disable finger, rsh and rlogin by default : > : >Do we really want to make a change this big to a branch that old? I : >don't think this is a security fix, per se, although it does have : >security and usibility implications. : : I mainly do it so that the four most used branches are on one line. : : And it reduces diff lines for my maintenance. : : Unless people explicitely don't want it... That's what I'm tyring to say. It obsoletes much documentation that's been written about 2.2.x and changes the default behavior that people rely on. This isn't something we generally do to a branch. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010081747.LAA02635>