Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Oct 2000 02:49:27 -0400
From:      Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com>
To:        Greg Skafte <skafte@worldgate.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: could this be a sysctl?
Message-ID:  <20001027024927.I37870@jade.chc-chimes.com>
In-Reply-To: <39F8CA7B.F409457@worldgate.ca>; from skafte@worldgate.ca on Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 06:21:15PM -0600
References:  <39F8CA7B.F409457@worldgate.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 06:21:15PM -0600, Greg Skafte wrote:

> I was contemplating could the rule autoincrement number be changed to
> a sysctl? ..... instead of using shell script math, or having to edit
> ip_fw.c to change the default from 100 to somethingelse.   
> 
> in my firewall scripts it would be nice to just do a 
> 
> 	sysctl -w  net.inet.ip.fw.countincrement = number
> 
> to change the increment value from the 100 default ....

There already is a PR (assigned to me) that does this. It works and all
I need to do is give it a onceover and commit it.

-- 
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
                billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001027024927.I37870>