Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 09:27:43 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <DougB@yahoo-inc.com> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/crypto/openssl/apps openssl.cnf Message-ID: <20001029092743.C89229@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <39FC0867.16607D7F@yahoo-inc.com>; from DougB@yahoo-inc.com on Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 03:22:15AM -0800 References: <200010291000.CAA45118@freefall.freebsd.org> <20001029025521.A87604@dragon.nuxi.com> <39FC0867.16607D7F@yahoo-inc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 03:22:15AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > In truth, because cvs id's make mergemaster comparisons much faster. After thinking a bit longer I finally came up with this maybe the case. > The file is comparatively small, and this is a one line change, so the > repo bloat will be small. For things I maintain, it isn't just the repo bloat, but the fact CVS handles this simple change stupidly. :-( So it takes that much longer to check and fix conflicts, especially when you have many files with even only $FreeBSD$ added. > I checked with Kris before I did it and he had no objections. Ah, that's that then. An "OKed by: Kris" wouldn't be a bad idea as it removes any objections as he's the maintainer and thus anything he says goes. :-) > If this is a huge problem I have no issues with the cvs-meister's > reversing the change. Its only a problem if Kris says it is. I just point out when files leave the vendor branch to make sure people realized it happened. Enjoy! -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001029092743.C89229>