Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 9 Dec 2000 11:22:47 +0100
From:      =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Guyomarch?= <rguyom@pobox.com>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: IPFIREWALL or IPFILTER?
Message-ID:  <20001209112247.A22773@diabolic-cow.chatgris.net>
In-Reply-To: <00dd01c05e2e$e42a0700$0b6cffc8@infolink.com.br>; from apina@infolink.com.br on Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 06:15:02PM -0200
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012031955270.59659-100000@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de> <00dd01c05e2e$e42a0700$0b6cffc8@infolink.com.br>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 06:15:02PM -0200, Antonio Carlos Pina wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I believe (sorry if I'm wrong) that you can't use DUMMYNET with IPFILTER,
> only with IPFW.

You're wrong.

> Besides that, I've seen a lot of people saying that IPFILTER is better than
> IPFW (faster, more powerful, etc)

Don't know if it's faster, but IPFilter is definitely way more powerful.

-- 
Rémi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001209112247.A22773>