Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 22:32:57 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: clefevre@noos.fr, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: patch for bsd.lib.mk to create include and lib dirs Message-ID: <20010125223257.I1122@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <200101252018.NAA27092@usr08.primenet.com>; from tlambert@primenet.com on Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 08:18:54PM %2B0000 References: <20010124231628.A442@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <200101252018.NAA27092@usr08.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 08:18:54PM +0000, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > would not be better to use install -d instead of mkdir -p which permit, > > > if needed alsewhere, to also set ownership ? > > > > D'oh.. great idea! This simplifies things, because there's no need > > for the sys.mk patch to define MKDIR; INSTALL is already defined. > > > > New patch attached. > > Question: are these changes using portable, or FreeBSD specific > options? > > The reason I ask is because of www.openpackages.org... If you mean my patch, it only uses -d, -o and -g. AFAIK, -o and -g are portable; GNU install has -d, I have no experience with install on other platforms. G'luck, Peter -- I am jealous of the first word in this sentence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010125223257.I1122>