Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 21:11:06 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NO MORE '-BETA' Message-ID: <20010316211106.A34611@spawn.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010316181429.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 06:14:29PM -0800 References: <20010316173503T.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <XFMail.010316181429.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 06:14:29PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > If 2% of our -stable userbase doesn't get it, then I'm not sure that > is justification for axeing it. This is even documented and announced > on the lists for crying out loud. :) Along these lines ... am I the only one who thinks that the branch _needs_ to be called BETA at this time? With all the MFCs that inevitably hit near release, a little more caution than usual is required by those tracking -STABLE. IMHO, of course. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010316211106.A34611>