Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:53:18 +0200
From:      Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: BDECFLAGS break current 4.x-stable build
Message-ID:  <20010410155318.A2074@burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
In-Reply-To: <20010409093630.B72961@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 09:36:30 -0700
References:  <m34rvyi2rc.fsf@emma1.emma.line.org> <20010409093630.B72961@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 09 Apr 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> Submit patches to fix them, then.

:-}

Seriously, would these be relevant for 4.x-stable still or would these
better be sent in for 5.x-current?

> BDECFLAGS is there for developers to work on code correctness and
> possible bugs resulting from language misuse (or general gcc pickiness
> which doesn't actually involve code bugs).  It doesn't change the code
> generated by gcc.

Yup, but now people looking through the archives have something to check
if their build fails. That's been one reason for submitting this. :-)

-- 
Matthias Andree

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010410155318.A2074>