Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 10:46:42 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Jason Smethers <jason@smethers.net> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSD libc for Linux? Message-ID: <20010501104642.A27136@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <002c01c0d25d$10af76a0$08cc1f40@pdq.net>; from jason@smethers.net on Tue, May 01, 2001 at 11:37:51AM -0500 References: <20010430172143.A9910@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <p05001909b7143ae910ea@[192.168.168.205]> <002c01c0d25d$10af76a0$08cc1f40@pdq.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 11:37:51AM -0500, Jason Smethers wrote: > The statistical differences may be a result of your programs use of the > rand() family. Linux's GNU libc decided not to implement these functions = for > backwards compatibility. Instead it aliases these functions to the random= () > family. We don't use randomness anywhere in this code so that's not it. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD4DBQE67vaBXY6L6fI4GtQRAmqXAJ4hOhg6oGLR3tXvFJJrND/znZby3QCWIiO6 mhCyvlZ3Zrui/26/5Qw2mg== =AiTM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010501104642.A27136>