Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 00:42:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@info.iet.unipi.it> To: Momma Bear Trish <trish@listmistress.org> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dummynet issues Message-ID: <200105072242.AAA02870@info.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.21.0105071511520.21937-100000@superconductor.rush.net> from Momma Bear Trish at "May 7, 2001 04:45:48 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Its a bridge, right after the router in ingress > > I;ve tried it different ways, but always > > 07000 102154250 105301608403 pipe 1 ip from 64.28.67.0/24 to any > 07001 81785362 6862740312 pipe 2 ip from any to 64.28.67.0/24 > > either before or after other rules. > > (so the rule number changes) > > the pipes are configured at 80Mbit/s out and 25Mbit/s in (its also a > 100Mbit full-duplex line, but we're limiting per cost) > > ipfw pipe 1 config bw 80Mbit/s delay 2ms > > ipfw pipe 2 config bw 25Mbit/s delay 2s > > kernel config has these lines in it: > > options HZ=20 two bad things above: 1) you have a 2 seconds(!) delay in pipe 2 configuration (unless it is a typo). You should not need any delay, anyways. 2) with high bandwidth, you surely need HZ=1000 or even higher to get a decent resolution. HZ=20 makes little sense for all practical purposes. > firewall# uname -a > FreeBSD firewall.andover.net 4.2-STABLE FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE #7: Mon Feb 12 > 08:20:09 EST 2001 > root@firewall.andover.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/FIREWALL i386 this is ok as long as the source has been updated after Feb.10... cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105072242.AAA02870>