Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 10:01:28 +0100 From: Rasputin <rara.rasputin@virgin.net> To: Wayne Pascoe <wayne.pascoe@realtime.co.uk> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: TCP/IP Subnetting Message-ID: <20010511100128.D21357@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <86r8xxnncd.fsf@pan.penguinpowered.org.uk>; from wayne.pascoe@realtime.co.uk on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 06:08:34PM %2B0100 References: <86r8xxnncd.fsf@pan.penguinpowered.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Wayne Pascoe <wayne.pascoe@realtime.co.uk> [010510 18:14]: > Hi all, > > I have a /25 IP range that I need to subnet. I need to give 4 > addresses to one network and the remaining addresses to the other > network. Can't be done. You can only split networks in half, so you can have: 128 addresses (126 usable) 64 (62 usable) 32 (30 usable) 16 (14 usable) 8 (6 usable) 8 (6 usable) <---- put your 4 here But now you're looking at 6 subnets, which isn't what you want. Don't know of a way round this , and you're looking at connecting all those separate subnets with a lot of networking kit. So basically, find another solution that doesn't require 4 Ips on their own subnet. How about 128 on their own subnet? -- Bipolar, adj.: Refers to someone who has homes in Nome, Alaska, and Buffalo, New York Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns :: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010511100128.D21357>