Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Jul 2001 17:41:35 -0500
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@sneakerz.org>
To:        "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>
Cc:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, Jake Burkholder <jake@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>, Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys systm.h condvar.h src/sys/kern kern_
Message-ID:  <20010705174135.A79818@sneakerz.org>
In-Reply-To: <200107052228.f65MSeU64741@aslan.scsiguy.com>; from gibbs@scsiguy.com on Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:28:40PM -0600
References:  <XFMail.010705123747.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <200107052228.f65MSeU64741@aslan.scsiguy.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Justin T. Gibbs <gibbs@scsiguy.com> [010705 17:28] wrote:
> >It happens with SMP, too, not just preemption.  The calls are an optimization
> >to avoid problems with releasing the lock after the wakeup.  The contention
> >can be avoided if we release the lock before calling wakeup(), but doing that
> >leaves a window open for another CPU to alter the data that the lock protects
> >possibly invalidating the wakeup that then gets sent.
> 
> This window exists anyway.  The locked mutex it not passed to the woken
> up thread, so there will always be a race between the woken up thread
> acquiring the mutex and some other thread on some other CPU acquiring it
> first and making the wakeup invalid.


Y'know this sorta got me thinking about something else, shouldn't the
wakeup() calls for most exclusive locks use wakeup_one?  I know
wakeup_one() hoses priority, but for the locks in things like vnodes
and the pager locks, shouldn't we do a wakeup_one() since it is an
exclusive lock?

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org]
Ok, who wrote this damn function called '??'?
And why do my programs keep crashing in it?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010705174135.A79818>