Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 21:19:22 -0500 From: Bruce Burden <brucegb@realtime.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Regarding New FreeBSD BenchMark From Sysadmin Mag (left out a fiew tuning options) Message-ID: <20010713211922.A8312@tigerfish2.my.domain> In-Reply-To: <200107140128.f6E1Stx06358@cwsys.cwsent.com>; from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca on Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 06:28:02PM -0700 References: <200107130205.f6D250Y136048@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <200107140128.f6E1Stx06358@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> Some SCSI drive manufacturers ship their drives
> with WCE enabled. Other SCSI drive manufacturers, who are more
> concerned with data integrity as opposed to performance figures, will
> ship their drives with WCE disabled.
>
I have 3 IBM drives, and the /root drives (U160's) are WCE
enabled. The non-root drive (also happens to be U2W), does not
have WCE enabled.
Could WCE be a featue of U160?
Bruce
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010713211922.A8312>