Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 08 Aug 2001 01:00:47 -0600
From:      Chris Fedde <chris@fedde.littleton.co.us>
To:        "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com>
Cc:        "Odhiambo Washington" <wash@wananchi.com>, "FBSD-Q" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>, kweheria@iconnect.co.ke
Subject:   Re: Isn't it true? 
Message-ID:  <200108080700.f7870l440614@fedde.littleton.co.us>
In-Reply-To: <001201c11fca$ff0ecf20$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001 22:28:46 -0700  "Ted Mittelstaedt" wrote:
 +------------------
 | Hi Odhiambo,
 | 
 |   Sorry about the top post here, but I wanted to give you the detailed
 | explanation before you start spending money on things, and before
 | the rest of the eager beavers here had got you totally confused. :-)
 +------------------

Ted,

It appears that you have confused the OP's product selection with
some other device.  I looked over the description of the Mainstreet
2701 at

    http://www.cid.alcatel.com/doctypes/product/html/

The 2701 appears to be an async NTU for use in a private TDM network.
From what I've read it looks like the OP is right on track to a
robust solution assuming that the circit between the two 2701 is
two unloaded copper pair A standard PC style 16550A UART should
work perfectly.  there is no need for a fancy synchronous interface
card. Infact one will not work with the V.24 interface on the 2701.

For this application the 2701 is a bit of overkill, If it is surplus
hardware that's great.  But if he is buying hardware to do this
and has line of sight I might recomend a pair of ORiNOCO 802.11b
cards and a pair of dish antennae.

chris

 +------------------
 | 
 |   You see, here in the US we don't use icky things like 64k sync circuits
 | anymore and most WAN techs are very unfamiliar with the oddball hardware
 | used to connect that stuff.  Instead, high speed WANS here are based around 
a
 | thing called a T1 or 1/24th of a t1 called a 56k circuit.  We use things
 | called DSU's that plug them in, which are different than the DTU's like
 | the Mainstreet 2701.
 | 
 |   By the way, thanks for the plug. :-)
 | 
 |   For starters, for just a single point-to-point link you don't need
 | Zebra.  At most if one side has a gateway to the Internet you might have a
 | couple of static routes in the routers.  Zebra, gated, and routed are intend
ed
 | to be used for WANS that have redundant links because as links come up and g
o
 | down the routes change, and the routing daemons manage those route table
 | changes.  Your WAN bandwidth is precious and expensive and you don't want to
 | waste it by shipping routing updates across it for routes that will never
 | change.
 | 
 |   Secondly, yes you can use a FreeBSD box in place of a Cisco router.  I do 
it
 | at the ISP that I admin and I run BGP4 with a full BGP feed on it.  I have 2
 | T1's and 2 100BaseT Ethernet connections into the box, and 3 of the
 | connections are Internet feeds.  It works fairly well.  The route table on
 | that system is close to 100k routes.  I use gated.
 | 
 |   Now, in your case I looked up the specs for the Mainstreet 2701.  First
 | of all the serial cable that comes out of it is a V.24 interface, it is
 | NOT an X.21 interface!!  Your not going to be happy with the results
 | attempting to plug it into an X.21 interface card. ;-)
 | 
 |   Secondly, it appears to be a _synchronous_ RS232C interface.  While it
 | is electrically compatible with a PC serial port, a garden variety PC
 | serial port is asynchronous, NOT synchronous, so that won't work either.
 | 
 |   As far as I know, there's only 2 vendors that currently are selling
 | sync serial cards with V.24 that will run under FreeBSD, the first is Sangom
a,
 | and the second (the vendor that I use) is a WANic 400 or 405, from SBS
 | Technologies.
 | 
 |   In my case I actually use the RISCom cards, they are the predicessor cards
 | to the WANic 400/405.  It's the same chipset, and made by the same vendor, t
he
 | only difference is that one card is ISA the other is PCI.
 | 
 |   In fact, the sync controller chipset in both of those cards is the
 | HD64570 chip, which is EXACTLY the same chip as Cisco uses in the 25xx
 | series of routers.  (2501, 2511, 2522, etc.)
 | 
 |   Now for the bad news:  a new WANic is going to cost about $800 USD unless
 | you can possibly find one used.  (and goodness knows I've tried - the 2
 | RISCom cards I got were used and they were eye-raising expensive as it was)
 | This is more money than if you get up on Ebay and buy yourself a used Cisco
 | 2522 or 2501 or something like that, plus cabling.  (In fact, I've got a use
d
 | 2501 with a RS232 sync cable that I'd sell but if you want to pursue that ta
ke
 | it offline with me.  I'm sure that you can find used vendors that are in you
r
 | country without the messiness of the import/export stuff)
 | 
 |   So, in summary if you want to use FreeBSD to save money, you won't because
 | the cost of a sync V.24 is going to be the killer.  If, however, you want to
 | do it just for fun, then that's fine - but remember that you have got 2
 | offices there and if your toy goes offline in the middle of the day your goi
ng
 | to have a lot of pissed-off people. :-)
 | 
 |   In our case the cost of a Cisco 7206  (the minimum Cisco capabable of
 | running BGP without up and dying) is about $30,000 USD so that was plenty of
 | financial incentive to go the BSD route.  (no pun intended)
 | 
 | Ted Mittelstaedt                                       tedm@toybox.placo.com
 | Author of:                           The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide
 | Book website:                          http://www.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com
 | 
 | 
 | >-----Original Message-----
 | >From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
 | >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Odhiambo
 | >Washington
 | >Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 8:11 AM
 | >To: FBSD-Q
 | >Cc: kweheria@iconnect.co.ke
 | >Subject: Isn't it true?
 | >
 | >
 | >Such a dumb subject line but isn't it true that nobody in the
 | >knowledge-rich FreeBSD world has ever gone out of their 'mind' (I mean
 | >their way) and done something like substituting a FreeBSD box for a Cisco
 | >router like this:
 | >                             Telco Link               _____
 | >  LAN<-->[____]----->[...]================[...]----->|_____|<----->LAN
 | >         FreeBSD     Mainstreet          Mainstreet   Cisco
 | >          Box         2701                 2701       2522
 | >
 | >
 | >If someone _ever_ tried it, I request to share in their feat ;-)
 | >
 | >
 | >Thanks
 | >
 | >
 | >-Wash
 | >
 | >--
 | >Odhiambo Washington
 | >Wananchi Online Ltd.,
 | >wash@wananchi.com 1st Flr Loita Hse.
 | >Tel: 254 2 313985 Loita Street.,
 | >Fax: 254 2 313922 PO Box 10286,00100-NAIROBI,KE.
 | >
 | >To sentence a man of true genius, to the drudgery of a school is to put a
 | >racehorse on a treadmill.
 | >-Charles Caleb Colton
 | >
 | >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
 | >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
 | >
 | 
 | 
 | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
 | with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
 +------------------

--
    Chris Fedde
    303 773 9134

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108080700.f7870l440614>