Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:13:37 +0100
From:      Brian Somers <brian@freebsd-services.com>
To:        Jordan Hubbard <jkh@freebsd.org>
Cc:        brian@freebsd-services.com, paul@freebsd-services.com, will@physics.purdue.edu, imp@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pccard pccard.c pcic.c pcic_pci.c pcicvar.h 
Message-ID:  <200109132013.f8DKDbd95974@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>
In-Reply-To: Message from Jordan Hubbard <jkh@freebsd.org>  of "Thu, 13 Sep 2001 12:46:41 PDT." <20010913124641B.jkh@freebsd.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I think it's a bit unfair to challenge people like this.  People 
> > contribute to FreeBSD in more ways than just coding.... commit counts 
> > aren't proportional to project participation.
> 
> Not to pick on you Brian, but everytime someone has the temerity to
> suggest that coding contributions DO matter, especially when we're so
> demonstrably and critically short of such resources, somebody else
> pops up and ignites this same tired smoke screen of denial and it
> sucks.

You're misrepresenting the facts.  I didn't suggest that coding 
contributions don't matter.  I suggested that they aren't the only 
thing that matter.

> Sure, there are other ways in which the project can be improved other
> than coding - documentation can be written and new software can be
> added to the ports collection or updated in place.  But each of those
> examples have one very important thing in common - they represent a
> significant and visible investment in the project, the kind of
> investment which is important not just for its own sake but for the
> message it sends to others that things ARE happening and progress is
> being made.

Absolutely, they're easy to measure.  My point is that attempting to 
silence people on the basis that their contributions aren't measurable 
is unfair.

For example, I have no idea what most of the people that post to the 
mailing lists do from day to day.  I therefore wouldn't presume to be 
in a position to tell them to contribute to the project in a more 
visible way...

  "Hey, Bob Bruce, why are you complaining that 1.9-release has 
   corrupt boot blocks in the ISO image ?  What have you ever done 
   for FreeBSD ?  Fix the damn things yourself !"

> Let's also not forget that these sorts of "put up or shut up"
> criticisms aren't generally made in a vacuum, with somebody just
> deciding to pop his cork out of the blue and suggest that maybe people
> should start writing some code or docs or whatever.  They're made in
> reaction to some self-appointed policeman waving his arms around and
> telling others how to do their work under the mistaken impression that
> this is a "contribution" which somehow measures up to that of those
> actually DOING the work.  I'm sorry, but no matter how you try to spin
> reality and alter the terms of our social contract in such a way that
> the project gestapo are now considered equivalent to the hard-core
> developers, it just doesn't make it so.

So you're saying that people who don't contribute to the project in 
a clearly measurable way have no say on the mailing lists ?

I'm sure I'm getting the wrong end of the stick here.

> - Jordan

-- 
Brian <brian@freebsd-services.com>                <brian@Awfulhak.org>
      http://www.freebsd-services.com/        <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !      <brian@[uk.]OpenBSD.org>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109132013.f8DKDbd95974>