Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 12:28:05 +0100 From: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> To: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> Cc: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net>, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RE: hw.ata.wc && hw.ata.tags && softupdates short question Message-ID: <20010921122805.A78591@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <200109210549.f8L5n6r67664@earth.backplane.com>; from dillon@earth.backplane.com on Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:49:06PM -0700 References: <XFMail.20010921121832.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200109210329.f8L3TGR30860@ptavv.es.net> <20010920211704.C7820@gateway.bogus> <15274.48864.994229.51687@guru.mired.org> <200109210549.f8L5n6r67664@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
So, to boil everything down, I have 1 question: On a workstation LAPTOP (IDE, low load, etc), does it make more sense to use softupdates, write caching, or both? jm -- My other computer is your windows box. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010921122805.A78591>